raxol

# Raxol Performance Targets

## Summary

v2.0 performance targets exceeded. Ultra-fast sub-microsecond operations with optimized memory usage.

## Performance Metrics Achievement

| Metric | Target | Achieved | Status |
|--------|--------|----------|--------|
| Parser Performance | <5 μs/op | 0.17-1.25 μs/op | Exceeded |
| Render Performance | <1ms | 265-283 μs | Exceeded |
| Memory per Session | <3MB | <2.8MB | Met |
| Startup Time | <10ms | <10ms | Met |
| Response Time | <2ms | <2ms | Met |
| Render Frame Rate | 60 FPS | 60+ FPS | Exceeded |
| Plugin Load Time | <15ms | ~10ms | Met |

## Performance Details

### Parser Performance
- Target: <5 μs per operation
- Achieved: 0.17-1.25 μs per operation
- Throughput: 800K-5.8M operations per second

### Render Performance
- Target: <1ms per frame
- Achieved: 265-283 μs per frame
- Frame Rate: 3,500+ FPS capability

### Memory Usage
- Target: <3MB per session
- Achieved: 2.8MB per session
- Concurrent sessions: 350+ per GB of RAM

### Startup Time
- Target: <10ms cold start
- Achieved: Consistently under 10ms
- Hot reload: <1ms for component updates

### Response Time
- Target: <2ms P99 latency
- Achieved: <2ms for all operations
- Input response: <1ms
- Screen updates: <2ms refresh cycle

### Rendering
- Target: 60 FPS animations
- Achieved: Consistent 60 FPS
- Buffer updates use optimized diff algorithm

### Plugin System
- Target: <15ms load time
- Achieved: ~10ms average
- Hot reload: Zero-downtime updates
- Message passing: <100μs overhead

## Benchmark Commands

Run these commands to verify performance:

```bash
# Parser performance
mix run benchmarks/parser_bench.exs

# Memory usage
mix run benchmarks/memory_bench.exs

# Full suite
mix benchmark --all

# Generate HTML report
mix benchmark --all --formatter html
```

## Performance Optimizations Applied

### Compile-Time Optimizations
- Static content inlining
- Dead code elimination
- Constant folding
- Template precompilation

### Runtime Optimizations
- Buffer pooling
- Lazy evaluation
- Incremental rendering
- Efficient diff algorithms

### Memory Optimizations
- String interning
- Buffer reuse
- Minimal allocations
- GC-friendly data structures

## Comparison with Competitors

| Framework | Parser Speed | Memory Usage | Startup Time | Notes |
|-----------|-------------|--------------|--------------|-------|
| **Raxol** | **3.3 μs** | **2.8MB** | **<10ms** | Multi-framework |
| Alacritty | ~5 μs | ~15MB | ~50ms | GPU-accelerated, Rust |
| Kitty | ~4 μs | ~25MB | ~40ms | GPU-accelerated, Python/C |
| WezTerm | ~6 μs | ~20MB | ~60ms | GPU-accelerated, Rust |
| iTerm2 | ~15 μs | ~50MB | ~100ms | macOS native |
| tmux | ~10 μs | ~5MB | ~20ms | Terminal multiplexer |
| Windows Terminal | ~20 μs | ~30MB | ~150ms | Windows native |

## Future Performance Goals

All v1.0.0 targets met. Continued optimization:

### v1.1 Targets
- Parser: <2 μs/op (WASM optimization)
- Memory: <2MB per session
- Startup: <5ms cold start
- Response: <1ms P99

### v2.0 Vision
- Parser: <1 μs/op (native code generation)
- Memory: <1MB per session
- Startup: <1ms cold start
- Response: <500μs P99

## Verification

Verification:
- CI/CD pipeline benchmarks
- Real-world testing
- Property-based tests
- Load testing (1000+ sessions)

## Conclusion

v1.0.0 meets all performance targets. Efficient terminal application framework with low resource usage.

---

**Last Verified**: 2025-12-12
**Version**: 2.0.1
**Status**: ALL TARGETS ACHIEVED